6/11/2023 0 Comments Topaz detail v3.2.0![]() ![]() ![]() So I’m fine with the 3.2 speeds, which are much faster than 2.6.4.Īs for quality, on Artemis High I can see no colour, brightness or contrast changes at all on A/B comparison, including single frame pixel peeping, though I don’t usually do that None at all. GPU load in GPU-Z was 83 to 90% average and CPU was 85% to 100% and I suspect that the differences I see may relate to those issues and what else the system is doing. Also, which version of Artemis do the benchmarks use? But there are many vagaries I didn’t try to correct for: which other system resources are in use, what if any caching is included, the length of video being converted and so on. I see 8.1 fps reported (checked with a stop watch from completion of model load) and this compares with 9.15 fps on the benchmark, so 11% slower. I already posted my results at 288p, 2x upscale and they are 3.3 times faster than 2.6.4.īut I just did some 2x upscales on 1920p video/25 fps using Artemis High. So please share it !ģ060 ti/Ryzen 7 5800x/Win 10/32GB memory. So my question is - is this some kind of bug or this is just a **SCAM benchmark** info to mislead the users that there is really great improvement in the newer Topaz software ?Įverybody can make such "real life" test for himself and compare with the benchmark info ! Will be nice to hear about other users experience. In all those tests it used less than 4GB of my VRAM (which is 24GB in total) and it also don’t use more than 30% of the GPU sometimes it barely touches 20%. And if you use an SSD for the system/swap, and use another SSD to the temp, it will be possible to process 8k with 32GB but it will be very slow due to the swapping process). In 8k scenario, a HDD will imediatly freeze because 1st the ammount size of temp files the TVAI is outputing and reading in the \local\temp, and 2nd because since it neets more than 32GB it will also use the system disc to swap (even if you split the load by redirecting the temp to a SSD it will freeze the OS if your swap area is in HDD. 4k you need 32GB (with HDD it could handle), but for 8k you need more than 32. The ammount of ram the system needs for certain tasks (in your case 640x480 is not too much), but for example, in my tests 16GB is ok for stabilyze 1080p (even with HDD) but not for 4k. In the real world scenario you have to account other things like your hard drive latency, the read and write speeds. It seems that it mostly mesures the CPU RAM and not too much the GPU VRAM (which is a pitty). This benchmark is just a checkup for processing power. So my question is - is this some kind of bug or this is just a SCAM benchmark info to mislead the users that there is really great improvement in the newer Topaz software ?Įverybody can make such “real life” test for himself and compare with the benchmark info ! Will be nice to hear about other users experience. Or this is about 4 times slower then the data from the benchmark !!! I decided to make “real life” test and the results unfortunately are pretty disturbingīy the benchmark i get about 30fps for 640x480p input upscaled 2X by Proteus ! But when i try to upscale real vid 2X by Proteus (no other enhancements enabled) it takes about 4 minutes for 1 minute of the original vid. Theoretical its more then twice faster then v3.1.9 - which is very good work ! But … Processing Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 0Īrtemis 1X: 8.78 fps 2X: 7.49 fps 4X: 1.92 fps I see that in pursuit of processing speed, TopazAI is steadily slipping to the level of Avidemux. There are many cool filters out there that work no worse than TopazAI on some movies. For unimportant videos, I use the free program Avidemux. In your opinion, if I uninstall this version of the program, and install 3.1.11, the video quality will return, or are the models already distorted at all? Please check someone thoroughly if using Apollo ArtemisHQ. Where did my black color go? Why did you make the video lighter, more hazy, more milky? Rotate my black on dark slices!!!įrom the fact that the dark places in the video frame became lighter, some extra spots came out… Then he made comparative freeze frames of two videos. Reconverted the same video that encoded yesterday on the old firmware 3.1.11. After the update, I immediately saw that the picture became somehow more illuminated. I convert 1080p24fps videos to 4K60 or 120fps always with the same settings. ![]() Topaz Plug-ins Bundle for Adobe Photoshop helps amateur and professional photographers accomplish the most common creative and corrective post processing tasks.Why everyone rejoices, like fools, at the increase in speed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |